The Railway
Service Agreement (ASA) and bilateral transit treaty between Nepal and India
need to address the early usage of Visakhapatnam Port by Nepal as it could serve as an additional and alternative port for third country
trade.
“Visakhapatnam
Port could be additional and alternative port to Nepal for its third country trade
but Nepal-India Transit Treaty and Railway Service Agreement should address it
for smooth operation of the route from Visakhapatnam in India to Birgunj in
Nepal,” according to former commerce secretary Purushottam Ojha.
Though, in
2009, the Indian government had approved Visakhapatnam Port as a second
shipment point for handling container cargo from Nepal, the two governments are
yet to exchange Letter of Credit for its implementation, he said, during Nepal-India
Business Conclave on ‘Visakhapatnam Port: Additional Gateway for Nepal’s Export-Import
Traffic’, here today.
Currently
Nepal is using Kolkata Port for its third country trade.
As Nepal’s trade volume has seen increment in recent years, the governments of Nepal and India should address the port’s early usages in the bilateral trade treaty, according to chief operating officer of Visakha Container Terminal — the operator of Visakhapatnam Port – Sushil Mulchandani.
As Nepal’s trade volume has seen increment in recent years, the governments of Nepal and India should address the port’s early usages in the bilateral trade treaty, according to chief operating officer of Visakha Container Terminal — the operator of Visakhapatnam Port – Sushil Mulchandani.
Though, Nepal
had asked India to provide access to five more trade and transit routes between
Vishakapatnam Port and four major customs points, rail route between Birgunj
dry port and Vishakapatnam, and Rohanpur-Singhabad-Jogbani and
Phulbari-Banglabandha routes, during the renewal of Nepal-India Transit Treaty
last year, the treaty was renewed without any changes making Nepal impossible to
use Vishakapatnam Port for the time being.
Opening of Visakhapatnam
Port – that is 700-km far away from the Kolkata Port – would give Nepal an alternative
trade route as the overall cost could not much differ, according to him.
“It would be,
however, more feasible for Nepali exporters and importers as India's second
largest port by volume of cargo handled, Visakhapatnam Port is more efficient, ultra
modern, fully computerised in handling the container and non-containerised
vessels,” Mulchandani said, claiming that Nepali traders could also check the
status of their containers inside the port from Nepal by visiting the company's
website.
The cost will not exceed compared to Kolkata Port as they will
save Ocean Freight time, and Visakhapatnam Port is nearer to China – one of
Nepal’s largest trading partners – and the US, he added. “Visakhapatnam Port is
congestion free and follows scheduled shipment that will also save cost.”
Inviting Nepali traders to visit the port, he also claimed that his company could help arrange road and rail transportation up to the Nepal’s border from Andra Pradesh, where the Visakhapatnam Port is.
Inviting Nepali traders to visit the port, he also claimed that his company could help arrange road and rail transportation up to the Nepal’s border from Andra Pradesh, where the Visakhapatnam Port is.
Currently, Nepal bound vessels, if starts from China are shipped via
Singapore, to Visakhapatnam Port, and then to Kolkata Port in filler vessels from where
it is routed to Birgunj Inland Container Depot (ICD), which takes more Ocean
Freight time. But the containers could be routed to Birgunj ICD directly from Visakhapatnam
Port saving the ocean freight time, Mulchandani suggested.
However, the traders and
freight forwarders were of the view that the Birgunj ICD also needs to be upgraded
and automated, apart from a special container railway from Visakhapatnam Port to
the Birgunj ICD to take maximum benefit from the port. “Birgunj ICD needs to be
automated and linked to Visakhapatnam Port for the smooth trade,” said Nepal Freight
Forwarders Association president Rajan Sharma, on the occasion.
No comments:
Post a Comment