Asia hosts the world's cheapest and most expensive cities

Seoul (Korea Newswire): The latest Economist Intelligence Unit cost of living survey highlights the way in which sharp shifts in exchange rates in recent months have altered the relative cost of living in cities around the world.
By comparing the ranking of cities in September 2008 (when the price survey was conducted) to the ranking in February 2009 (adjusting the September price data for recent exchange-rate movements), it is possible to see which locations have been relative winners or losers as a result of the currency dislocation.

Asia: Home to the cheapest and most expensive
The impact on the ranking of Asian cities of rebasing the survey to February 2009 exchange rates is very mixed, as the region plays host to countries with the most and the least expensive cost of living in the survey. Cities in Australia and New Zealand have seen dramatic falls of between 21 and 25 index points. Conversely a stronger yen now means that the Japanese cities of Tokyo and Osaka have become the most expensive cities in our survey. The Chinese renminbi is tightly linked to the US dollar, which means that the relative cost of living in Chinese cities has risen as the currencies of other countries fall. Shanghai, with a cost of living that is only two per cent cheaper than New York, is now more expensive than Sydney (Australia), which is eight per cent cheaper. Asia is home to many of the least expensive cities in the world, supplying five of the ten cheapest locations in the survey, four of which hail from the Indian subcontinent. Manila (Philippines), in 126th position, joins Kathmandu, New Delhi, Mumbai and Karachi.
The cost of living in Manila is half that of New York, whereas that in Karachi, the cheapest city in the survey, is just over one-third of that of New York.

Global round-up
Oslo (Norway), previously the most expensive city, has fallen to fifth place, below Paris (France) and Copenhagen (Denmark). London (UK), originally ranked eighth, has slid dramatically in line with a weak sterling to joint 27th position, below New York (US) for the first time since 2002. Reykjavik (Iceland), one of the early casualties of the current global malaise, was the fifth most expensive city last year. It fell to 39th using exchange rates from September 2008, but by February this year had fallen to 67th in the ranking.
Jon Copestake, editor of the report, comments, "Two factors drive the relative cost of living: local prices and exchange rates. Normally our ranking of cities by cost of living is relatively stable, but in the current global climate changes in exchange rates have significantly altered our assessment of the most and least expensive cities."
The main changes in the ranking, achieved by applying February 2009 exchange rates to the original price data collated in September 2008, occur among the most expensive cities. The decline of European currencies, most notably the euro, sterling and the Norwegian krone, has driven a significant weakening in the relative cost of living for many European cities. West European cities still dominate the top ten worldwide, with just three cities (Tokyo, Osaka and Singapore) from outside Europe. Nevertheless, the cost of living gap has closed. The strong US dollar has meant that cities in the United States, along with any country that pegs its currency to the dollar, have jumped in the ranking.
New York, Los Angeles and Chicago have risen from joint 39th to joint 23rd position, and Hong Kong has risen by 17 places to 11th in the ranking. Much less affected are the lower-cost locations in the world.

The cheapest ones: Kathmandu ranks 128th
The cheapest cities in the survey remain predominantly Asian, with four of the bottom five hailing from the Indian subcontinent: Kathmandu (Nepal), 128th; New Delhi and Mumbai (India), 129th and 130th respectively; and Karachi (Pakistan), 132nd.

This survey compares the original findings of the September 2008 cost of living survey to those at February 2009 exchange rates. For the purposes of this release it is assumed that local prices have not moved between September, when the survey took place, and February when the new exchange rates were applied. The customisation of exchange rates is a standard feature of the worldwide cost of living survey to account for fluctuations like those seen in recent months. Worldwide Cost of Living, the bi-annual Economist Intelligence Unit survey, compares prices and products in 140 cities around the world.
Its purpose is to provide companies with an unbiased and independent guide from which allowances can be calculated for executives and their families being sent overseas. The Economist Intelligence Unit can calculate indices based on any one of the cities. The data quoted here used New York as a base index of 100 for comparisons.

About the Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit is the business information arm of The Economist Group, publisher of The Economist.
Economist Intelligence Unit Worldwide Cost Of Living 2009